<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nahmod Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nahmodlaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nahmodlaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 03:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='nahmodlaw.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://nahmodlaw.com/osd.xml" title="Nahmod Law" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://nahmodlaw.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Filarsky v. Delia: A New Supreme Court Private Individual Immunity Decison</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/05/09/filarsky-v-delia-a-new-supreme-court-private-individual-immunity-decison/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/05/09/filarsky-v-delia-a-new-supreme-court-private-individual-immunity-decison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights - Section 1983]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.com/?p=1368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filarsky v. Delia I blogged on November 10, 2011, about the Supreme Court&#8216;s grant of certiorari in Delia v. City of Rialto, 621 F. 3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2011), sub nom Filarsky v. Delia, No. 10-1018, where the Ninth Circuit held that a private attorney retained by the government was not entitled to qualified immunity, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1368&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/05/09/filarsky-v-delia-a-new-supreme-court-private-individual-immunity-decison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://nahmodlaw.wordpress.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">More...</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://nahmodlaw.wordpress.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">More...</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rehberg v. Paulk: A New Supreme Court Absolute Immunity Decision</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/04/18/rehberg-v-paulk-a-new-supreme-court-absolute-immunity-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/04/18/rehberg-v-paulk-a-new-supreme-court-absolute-immunity-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights - Section 1983]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.com/?p=1357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Background I blogged on June 16, 2011, about the Court&#8217;s grant of certiorari in Rehberg v. Paulk, No. 10-788, a decision out of the Eleventh Circuit, which raised the following Question Presented: &#8220;Whether a government official who acts as a “complaining witness” [in a grand jury proceeding] by presenting perjured testimony against an innocent citizen [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1357&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/04/18/rehberg-v-paulk-a-new-supreme-court-absolute-immunity-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Certiorari Granted in Reichle v. Howards: A First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Case</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/03/29/certiorari-granted-in-reichle-v-howards-a-first-amendment-retaliatory-arrest-case/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/03/29/certiorari-granted-in-reichle-v-howards-a-first-amendment-retaliatory-arrest-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights - Section 1983]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.com/?p=1341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Question Suppose a police officer arrests a person with objective probable cause to arrest but with the subjective motivation to arrest him because of something he said, in violation of the First Amendment? Does the Fourth Amendment probable cause determination have any bearing on the section 1983 First Amendment claim [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1341&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/03/29/certiorari-granted-in-reichle-v-howards-a-first-amendment-retaliatory-arrest-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryburn v. Huff: New Supreme Court Qualified Immunity Decision and a Slapdown of the Ninth Circuit</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/03/09/ryburn-v-huff-new-supreme-court-qualified-immunity-decision-and-a-slapdown-of-the-ninth-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/03/09/ryburn-v-huff-new-supreme-court-qualified-immunity-decision-and-a-slapdown-of-the-ninth-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights - Section 1983]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.com/?p=1322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ryburn v. Huff: A Ninth Circuit Qualified Immunity Slapdown In the course of my section 1983 presentations to attorneys and judges, I have occasionally referred to the Ninth Circuit as &#8220;the circuit that the Supreme Court loves to hate&#8221; because the Court appears to reverse the Ninth Circuit with greater frequency than it does other [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1322&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/03/09/ryburn-v-huff-new-supreme-court-qualified-immunity-decision-and-a-slapdown-of-the-ninth-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: A Video Presentation</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/02/24/the-constitutionality-of-the-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-a-video-presentation/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/02/24/the-constitutionality-of-the-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-a-video-presentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.com/?p=1305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 18, 2012, I blogged about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PDF) whose constitutionality is currently before the Supreme Court. In that post, I focused on the Commerce Clause challenge to the individual mandate. On February 10, 2012, I participated in an hour-long discussion of the overall constitutionality of the Act at a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1305&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/02/24/the-constitutionality-of-the-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-a-video-presentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Messerschmidt v. Millender: A New Qualified Immunity Search Warrant Decision</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/02/21/certiorari-granted-in-messerschmidt-v-millender-a-new-qualified-immunity-search-warrant-case/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/02/21/certiorari-granted-in-messerschmidt-v-millender-a-new-qualified-immunity-search-warrant-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights - Section 1983]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.com/?p=1188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Certiorari Granted in Messerschmidt v. Millender (updated: see below for decision handed down 2-22-12) This Term the Supreme Court will decide Messerschmidt v. Millender, 131 S. Ct. &#8212; (2011)(No. 10-704), granting certiorari in Millender v. County of Los Angeles, 620 F.3d 1016 (9th Cir. 2009)(en banc), which deals with the following Questions Presented: (1) Whether police [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1188&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/02/21/certiorari-granted-in-messerschmidt-v-millender-a-new-qualified-immunity-search-warrant-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Supreme Court Religion Decision: Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/02/02/new-supreme-court-religion-decision-hosanna-tabor-evangelical-lutheran-church-and-school/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/02/02/new-supreme-court-religion-decision-hosanna-tabor-evangelical-lutheran-church-and-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.wordpress.com/?p=1279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Rare Unanimous Religion Clauses Decision by the Supreme Court It is rare for the Justices of the Supreme Court to hand down a unanimous decision in a Religion Clauses case. But it happened on January 11, 2012, in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Church and School v. EEOC, 132 S. Ct. &#8212; (2012). This case involved the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1279&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/02/02/new-supreme-court-religion-decision-hosanna-tabor-evangelical-lutheran-church-and-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: The Commerce Clause and Constitutional Trust</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/01/18/the-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-the-commerce-clause-and-constitutional-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/01/18/the-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-the-commerce-clause-and-constitutional-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.com/?p=1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I blogged over two years ago on the Commerce Clause&#8211;see post of September 26, 2009&#8211;where I provided a doctrinal and historical perspective that readers might want to consult for background. The Florida Case and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act In this post I want to say some things about the high-profile case currently [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1252&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/01/18/the-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-the-commerce-clause-and-constitutional-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog on Break</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2011/12/23/blog-on-break/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2011/12/23/blog-on-break/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.com/?p=1243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blog is on break grading exams and papers, doing some writing and enjoying Chicago&#8217;s theater, music and culture scene until the middle of January, when the spring semester begins at Chicago-Kent College of Law (on January 17, 2012). Next year I will  continue to blog on section 1983 and constitutional law. I also expect [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1243&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2011/12/23/blog-on-break/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Monroe to Connick: Video</title>
		<link>http://nahmodlaw.com/2011/12/19/from-monroe-to-connick-video/</link>
		<comments>http://nahmodlaw.com/2011/12/19/from-monroe-to-connick-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snahmod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights - Section 1983]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nahmodlaw.com/?p=1227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my post of December 6, 2011, I provided an audio link to my November 3 presentation at Loyola Law School (New Orleans), as part of a program entitled &#8220;Prosecutorial Immunity: Deconstructing Connick v. Thompson.&#8221; My 40 minute presentation is entitled: &#8220;The Long and Winding Road From Monroe to Connick.&#8221; In it, I discuss the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nahmodlaw.com&#038;blog=8604426&#038;post=1227&#038;subd=nahmodlaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nahmodlaw.com/2011/12/19/from-monroe-to-connick-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.kentlaw.edu/faculty/snahmod/classes/weblogvideos/nahmod-prosecutorial-liability.ram" length="78" type="audio/x-realaudio" />
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/80cc17d0084ce3d8f14f3450d3799421?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Professor Nahmod</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://forms.real.com/rndl/images/real_logo.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
